Next obstacle to flying - Fuel Strainer
Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher
-
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:01 pm
Next obstacle to flying - Fuel Strainer
Looks like my fuel strainer is in need of replacement (main body is badly corroded). Having trouble finding a suitable replacement and based on the parts manual, I'm not even sure I know what the correct part number is. The illustration does not show a number for the main body of the strainer, just all of the other accessory parts.
I circled the part in question in the diagram attached.
Any ideas?
I circled the part in question in the diagram attached.
Any ideas?
Andrew Hochhaus
N3996V - 1948 170
N3996V - 1948 170
- Bruce Fenstermacher
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am
Re: Next obstacle to flying - Fuel Strainer
What you need is a new gascolator. That is what this is and since that part is the main body you probably won't find a part # for it.
Steve's Aircraft has new metal gascolators approved for the A and B model but they don't list the '48. They also have one approved for the 120/140 which is probably the same as the one in your '48. If they have a PMA to make the Cessna 120/140 part and it is the same part as the ''48 you could use it with out further approval. http://www.stevesaircraft.com/gascolator.php
There are other gascolator sources, legally using them is the question.
When you say this part is corroded what do you mean? Is it pitted so bad it leaks or is it corroded so bad it will fall apart? Or does it just look ugly? Looking ugly doesn't mean it's not airworthy.
Steve's Aircraft has new metal gascolators approved for the A and B model but they don't list the '48. They also have one approved for the 120/140 which is probably the same as the one in your '48. If they have a PMA to make the Cessna 120/140 part and it is the same part as the ''48 you could use it with out further approval. http://www.stevesaircraft.com/gascolator.php
There are other gascolator sources, legally using them is the question.
When you say this part is corroded what do you mean? Is it pitted so bad it leaks or is it corroded so bad it will fall apart? Or does it just look ugly? Looking ugly doesn't mean it's not airworthy.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!
Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
Re: Next obstacle to flying - Fuel Strainer
Fearless,
I may have exactly what you need. My gascolator glass was broken recently and I wound up replacing the entire unit with a Steve's Gascolator. I have the remaining parts of my original gascolator as surplus. PM me with an address and an offer and I will send it your way.
Bill
N2575D
I may have exactly what you need. My gascolator glass was broken recently and I wound up replacing the entire unit with a Steve's Gascolator. I have the remaining parts of my original gascolator as surplus. PM me with an address and an offer and I will send it your way.
Bill
N2575D
-
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:01 pm
Re: Next obstacle to flying - Fuel Strainer
It is pitted bad enough that it leaks.Bruce Fenstermacher wrote: When you say this part is corroded what do you mean? Is it pitted so bad it leaks or is it corroded so bad it will fall apart?
Thanks for the link.
Andrew Hochhaus
N3996V - 1948 170
N3996V - 1948 170
- Bruce Fenstermacher
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am
Re: Next obstacle to flying - Fuel Strainer
Your gascolator (fuel strainer) is a Koehler part number 0450013-4
Here is a thread with some more info. Pay close attention to the references to tractor parts. It could be the ticket to finding the part your need.
http://www.cessna170.org/forums/viewtop ... f=2&t=4924
Here is another thread. Pay close attention to the 4th, 5th and specially the 6th post.
http://cessna170.com/forums/viewtopic.p ... 76&start=0
Here is a thread with some more info. Pay close attention to the references to tractor parts. It could be the ticket to finding the part your need.
http://www.cessna170.org/forums/viewtop ... f=2&t=4924
Here is another thread. Pay close attention to the 4th, 5th and specially the 6th post.
http://cessna170.com/forums/viewtopic.p ... 76&start=0
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!
Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:01 pm
Re: Next obstacle to flying - Fuel Strainer
Bill,BeeMan wrote:Fearless,
I may have exactly what you need. My gascolator glass was broken recently and I wound up replacing the entire unit with a Steve's Gascolator. I have the remaining parts of my original gascolator as surplus. PM me with an address and an offer and I will send it your way.
Bill
N2575D
Is your's for a '48? Your N-number shows as a B model which has what appears to be a very different gascolator than the '48. The '48 looks like it is the same as the 140, although some of the part numbers are different.
Andrew Hochhaus
N3996V - 1948 170
N3996V - 1948 170
-
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:01 pm
Re: Next obstacle to flying - Fuel Strainer
Owning a '48 is turning out to be a royal pain in the butt.
FWIW, I talked to the guys at Steve's Aircraft - the SA3-00-B is approved for the 170 A and 170 B. The SA3-00 is approved for the 140. They do not have approval for the ragwing. Now, from everything I've read on the forum and comparison of the parts manuals, I'm pretty sure that the gascolator in the '48 is the same as what is in the 140, but without approval, looks like I'll need a 337, unless I can find a proper replacement. Any other ideas?
FWIW, I talked to the guys at Steve's Aircraft - the SA3-00-B is approved for the 170 A and 170 B. The SA3-00 is approved for the 140. They do not have approval for the ragwing. Now, from everything I've read on the forum and comparison of the parts manuals, I'm pretty sure that the gascolator in the '48 is the same as what is in the 140, but without approval, looks like I'll need a 337, unless I can find a proper replacement. Any other ideas?
Andrew Hochhaus
N3996V - 1948 170
N3996V - 1948 170
- Bruce Fenstermacher
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am
Re: Next obstacle to flying - Fuel Strainer
I don't know about all '48s but maybe yours is a pain.Fearless Tower wrote:Owning a '48 is turning out to be a royal pain in the butt.
..... Any other ideas?
Other ideas? Yes I'd get a hold of Bill who posted above and either buy his good parts or ask him what approval he used to get the Steve's Aircraft one approved.
You didn't answer these questions. Are the 140 and the 170 parts the SAME part number. Does Steve's have a PMA to make that part. If you answer yes to these two questions you have all the approvals you need to use Steve's gascolator regardless what Steve's STCs cover.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!
Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:01 pm
Re: Next obstacle to flying - Fuel Strainer
Problem with Bill's is that unless he was talking about a different plane, I believe his is a B model - not the same gascolator.Bruce Fenstermacher wrote: Other ideas? Yes I'd get a hold of Bill who posted above and either buy his good parts or ask him what approval he used to get the Steve's Aircraft one approved.
Some of the part numbers in the assembly are the same and some are not - I believe it was in one of the other gascolator threads that mentioned Cessna used Koehler part numbers on the 140, but started renumbering them to the Cessna convention with the 170. FWIW, the overall strainer assy is a different part number, but the body itself (K2201B) is indeed same. I just registered on the 140 Association and am going to look there.You didn't answer these questions. Are the 140 and the 170 parts the SAME part number. Does Steve's have a PMA to make that part. If you answer yes to these two questions you have all the approvals you need to use Steve's gascolator regardless what Steve's STCs cover.
As I mentioned earlier, Steve has the PMA for the 140. He has the PMA for the 170A and B. But even though the gascolator appears to be the same in the 140 and '48 170, it is not PMA'd for the '48 (that is exactly what Steve's Aircraft told me). And since it is an actual alteration of the original, it is not like I can slap it in and say that I found the right part number for my a/c.
Andrew Hochhaus
N3996V - 1948 170
N3996V - 1948 170
-
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:01 pm
Re: Next obstacle to flying - Fuel Strainer
It's okay....I still love her. Problem is that I bought an airplane that I knew needed a lot of TLC (and I paid a fair price accordingly). It is turning out to be a little more of a fixer-upper than I had planned, but still not what I would call a restoration.Bruce Fenstermacher wrote:I don't know about all '48s but maybe yours is a pain.
Fortunately, this plane isn't so much of a money pit as it is a matter of needing alot of hard to find parts.
Andrew Hochhaus
N3996V - 1948 170
N3996V - 1948 170
-
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:01 pm
Re: Next obstacle to flying - Fuel Strainer
Re-reading your post, Bruce, I think I see what you are saying, but I'm still not sure how the part can be replaced without a model specific PMA since it is a modification to the original design.Bruce Fenstermacher wrote: You didn't answer these questions. Are the 140 and the 170 parts the SAME part number. Does Steve's have a PMA to make that part. If you answer yes to these two questions you have all the approvals you need to use Steve's gascolator regardless what Steve's STCs cover.
Comparing the 140 to the 170 parts manuals, shows this:
The part number for the whole strainers are:
C-140 : K2200B-3/8 - Fuel Strainer - Koehler
C-170: 0450013-4 - Fuel Strainer - Koehler
While the main strainer part numbers are different, all of the sub-parts for both strainers are exactly identical.
Additionally, the fittings to connect the strainer to the system are not identical between the two aircraft FWIW.
Andrew Hochhaus
N3996V - 1948 170
N3996V - 1948 170
Re: Next obstacle to flying - Fuel Strainer
I think what Bruce is saying (correct me if I'm wrong Bruce), is that if the 'Steve's' gascolater assembly , that is approved for the 140, and the part of that assembly that you need is the same PN# (IPC#) for your 170, then you can use it. You're not replacing an entire gascolator assy with an STD'd unit, you're replacing a part with a PMA'd part. Is that right Bruce?
Del Lehmann
Mena, Arkansas
Mena, Arkansas
-
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:01 pm
Re: Next obstacle to flying - Fuel Strainer
But, the Steve's unit is a whole assembly - and since it is a newer all aluminum design, I doubt that the individual parts are interchangeable. I don't think that I can take the body of the SA3-00 from Steve's and use it in place of the corroded part I have.wingnut wrote:You're not replacing an entire gascolator assy with an STD'd unit, you're replacing a part with a PMA'd part. Is that right Bruce?
Andrew Hochhaus
N3996V - 1948 170
N3996V - 1948 170
- Bruce Fenstermacher
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am
Re: Next obstacle to flying - Fuel Strainer
Lets see if I can say it different.
First the entire gascolator has a part number. We are talking about finding an entire unit that will work and be legal. For the 140 Fearless has provided that it is a K2200B-3/8 - Fuel Strainer - Koehler. Now K2200B-3/8 doesn't sound like a Cessna part number, it sounds like a Koehler number but I'll go on. If Steve's has a PMA to make a K2200B-3/8 - Koehler then it really doesn't matter that it doesn't look the same or the parts are interchangeable with the original. Steve's version of a K2200B-3/8 has received a PMA as a replacement part. They're interchangeable in the FAA eyes.
Now if you found that a K2200B-3/8 is also a 0450013-4 which is the part for a 170 then you could use Steve's version of a K2200B-3/8 because in the FAA eyes it is the same part.
So the questions remain. Does Steve's have a PMA to make a K2200B-3/8?
Is the Cessna part number K2200B-3/8 or is it another number?
If it is another number does it happen to be 0450013-4?
If K2200B-3/8 is Cessna's 140 part number, then what Koehler strainer is 0450013-4? Could it be a K2200B-3/8?
If it quacks like a Duck, flies like a duck, it just might be a Duck. Of course it in this case it might be Steve's idea what a Duck looks like and it's been blessed by the FAA to in fact be, a Duck.
First the entire gascolator has a part number. We are talking about finding an entire unit that will work and be legal. For the 140 Fearless has provided that it is a K2200B-3/8 - Fuel Strainer - Koehler. Now K2200B-3/8 doesn't sound like a Cessna part number, it sounds like a Koehler number but I'll go on. If Steve's has a PMA to make a K2200B-3/8 - Koehler then it really doesn't matter that it doesn't look the same or the parts are interchangeable with the original. Steve's version of a K2200B-3/8 has received a PMA as a replacement part. They're interchangeable in the FAA eyes.
Now if you found that a K2200B-3/8 is also a 0450013-4 which is the part for a 170 then you could use Steve's version of a K2200B-3/8 because in the FAA eyes it is the same part.
So the questions remain. Does Steve's have a PMA to make a K2200B-3/8?
Is the Cessna part number K2200B-3/8 or is it another number?
If it is another number does it happen to be 0450013-4?
If K2200B-3/8 is Cessna's 140 part number, then what Koehler strainer is 0450013-4? Could it be a K2200B-3/8?
If it quacks like a Duck, flies like a duck, it just might be a Duck. Of course it in this case it might be Steve's idea what a Duck looks like and it's been blessed by the FAA to in fact be, a Duck.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!
Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
Re: Next obstacle to flying - Fuel Strainer
Bruce,
I get what you're saying now. I think I was mixing up all the info. Not unusual for me. I agree that if it can be determined the Cessna# and the Koehler# are indeed the same part, no additional approval would be needed. Oftentimes an STC holder fails to be all inclusive, and/or fails to extend their approvals to other models.
I get what you're saying now. I think I was mixing up all the info. Not unusual for me. I agree that if it can be determined the Cessna# and the Koehler# are indeed the same part, no additional approval would be needed. Oftentimes an STC holder fails to be all inclusive, and/or fails to extend their approvals to other models.
Del Lehmann
Mena, Arkansas
Mena, Arkansas