Fuel vent relocation to wing

How to keep the Cessna 170 flying and airworthy.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21015
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Fuel vent relocation to wing

Post by GAHorn »

And exactly "why" is a checkvalve required for an overboard vent? Answer: to prevent siphoning for vents which exit below the fuel leve such as underwing vents. A gooseneck has no such problem.

A much simpler (and less-costly STC to develop) method to dispense with the gooseneck (if it's truly a bothersome thing for you) would be to install dual vented gas-caps and remove the gooseneck completely, leaving the crossover vent line intact. (Why worry about an overboard path at all?) Of course, that would require a approval. I"ve got a lot of more interesting/useful things to spend money on before I spend a dime getting rid of a gooseneck. I suspect Steve will have wasted a lot of money if he completes that STC (considering how many folks would really buy it.)
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
Post Reply