MT Propeller

How to keep the Cessna 170 flying and airworthy.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

Post Reply
User avatar
flat country pilot
Posts: 230
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:46 pm

MT Propeller

Post by flat country pilot »

Any one call Robert Vulsanovic about a possible STC for an electrically controlled MT prop for the C145 and 0-300?

Well I did. He has an ad in the 4th Qtr 170 news and the December fly paper. Not sure why he didn't post it here.
They are claiming 12 to 13% improvement in take off, climb, HP, and thrust. A flatter prop allows higher rpms and therefore a little more HP.

Why wasn't, or isn't, the McCauley C7 two position prop more popular? Was it not reliable or didn't it produce the performance that it did on paper?

Bill
Flat Country Pilot
Farm Field PVT
54 C170B
User avatar
blueldr
Posts: 4442
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 3:16 am

Re: MT Propeller

Post by blueldr »

Did he say they had an STC for it on the C-170 with a Cont. C-145/O-300?
BL
User avatar
flat country pilot
Posts: 230
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:46 pm

Re: MT Propeller

Post by flat country pilot »

No, they are doing the engineering and calculating the feasibility of an STC for the C145 and 0-300. He told me the 170, 170A and 170B would be included.
Flat Country Pilot
Farm Field PVT
54 C170B
User avatar
Bruce Fenstermacher
Posts: 10321
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am

Re: MT Propeller

Post by Bruce Fenstermacher »

That would be very cool to have an electrically controlled prop option.

Who knows why the two position prop wasn't very popular. I had a demonstration ride in the only plane I know that has one and it seemed to perform very well.

I'd venture to guess one of the problems or limitations with the McCauley two position prop is it required the installation of the C-145-2H or 0-300-B engine with the control for the prop. Not many airplanes came with these engines I'd guess and who would change out a good -2 or -A for the -2H or -B with the added cost.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!

Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
Vuksanovic
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: MT Propeller

Post by Vuksanovic »

Hello gentlemen,

Still working on the MT Propeller options!

Once engineering is complete, we will need about 50 orders.

Rob Vuksanovic
bagarre
Posts: 2615
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 11:35 pm

Re: MT Propeller

Post by bagarre »

At 50 orders, what do you imagine the cost will be per unit?

-David
User avatar
cowboy
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 4:23 am

Re: MT Propeller

Post by cowboy »

I'll be very interested in the performance improvements. Especially at higher field elevations for climb.
Jeff
I'm not flying, I'm falling with style!
User avatar
blueldr
Posts: 4442
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 3:16 am

Re: MT Propeller

Post by blueldr »

I sort of remember a fly in about twenty years ago when the owner of a prop shop in stockton had an MT prop on a 172 and said he was trying to ger an STC or something to install them on the C-172s. Never heard any more about it. The shop later changed owners.
BL
terryg3454
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:24 pm

Re: MT Propeller

Post by terryg3454 »

Vuksanovic wrote:Hello gentlemen,

Still working on the MT Propeller options!

Once engineering is complete, we will need about 50 orders.

Rob Vuksanovic
i would probably be one of the 50
User avatar
lowNslow
Posts: 1530
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 4:20 pm

Re: MT Propeller

Post by lowNslow »

A while back there was a guy in Salinas California that had a 180hp 170B with the MT three bladed prop on it. I believe it was a field approval.
Karl
'53 170B N3158B SN:25400
ASW-20BL
Post Reply