Fuel vent relocation to wing

How to keep the Cessna 170 flying and airworthy.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21003
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Fuel vent relocation to wing

Post by GAHorn »

ron74887 wrote:Goerge, they do not have a check-valve per say, but the way they are made have a rubber seal that allows air to come in yet not go out acting as a check. ... Ron
WRONG.. Oh, Palm-Tree Feller!
All they have is a hole punched in the center of the cap.
MVC-002S.JPG
MVC-003S.JPG
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
ron74887
Posts: 298
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 2:18 am

Re: Fuel vent relocation to wing

Post by ron74887 »

Damn you're qiuck. I'll have to look at mine but I think they have a rubber seal(flap) over the hole. I painted mine and put a decal for fuel quantity and octane rating on the inner circle and don't even remember the hole. :oops: :oops: That's bad (normal) Ron
President 86-88
53 C170-B N74887, people choice 2003, Best original B 2007
46 7BCM champ N2843E Rebuilding stage
Cajun Connection way down south, most of you are yankees to me!
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21003
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Fuel vent relocation to wing

Post by GAHorn »

They're good caps. They'e inexpensive too. I wish they were legal. (At least their gaskets are a perfect fit for genuine Cessna fuel and oil-filler caps.)
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21003
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Fuel vent relocation to wing

Post by GAHorn »

By the way, Ron. Did you happen to notice their warning, "Not compatible with auto gas."?
http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/a ... elcaps.php
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
ron74887
Posts: 298
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 2:18 am

Re: Fuel vent relocation to wing

Post by ron74887 »

No never noticed that. :oops: Wonder if that is for the gasket, aluminum or just what part is not compatible????? maybe that little rubber yours didn't have. :lol: :lol: Ron
President 86-88
53 C170-B N74887, people choice 2003, Best original B 2007
46 7BCM champ N2843E Rebuilding stage
Cajun Connection way down south, most of you are yankees to me!
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21003
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Fuel vent relocation to wing

Post by GAHorn »

Unlike you, Ron, I don't use little rubbers. :lol:
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
ron74887
Posts: 298
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 2:18 am

Re: Fuel vent relocation to wing

Post by ron74887 »

There goes that TEXASS ego again. 8O 8O My caps don't look like that at all. They have two holes drilled at the inside flanges that vent to the underside a of the cap and also to the inside of the rubber gasket. I ordered them from AS but do not have the part nos. that I know of--unless the AI put them on the annual paperwork after it was painted. Will look. I don't know if they would vent fuel out because of low pressure like the one in the pic. I would think that one would vent fuel all the time. I do have a few stains but not real sure where it is coming from. Ron
President 86-88
53 C170-B N74887, people choice 2003, Best original B 2007
46 7BCM champ N2843E Rebuilding stage
Cajun Connection way down south, most of you are yankees to me!
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21003
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Fuel vent relocation to wing

Post by GAHorn »

I think I've seen what you are describing, Ron... and if I'm correct, those are automotive fuel caps, perhaps made by Stant. If they "vent" to the INSIDE of the gaskets, then they do not really "vent".
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
ron74887
Posts: 298
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 2:18 am

Re: Fuel vent relocation to wing

Post by ron74887 »

Word game again--they vent to the top side of the flange on the inside dia. of the gasket. :? :? :? If that isn't as clear as mud. I not sure I can describe it any better. Consider two pieces a flange and a cover. On your picture the hole is drill on the flange lip (curve) just above the tabs that locks the cap in place. Then it vents to the underside of the cover. I may have to take a pic and email it to you. I was just wondering if there is a low pressure under the cap (cover). Ron
President 86-88
53 C170-B N74887, people choice 2003, Best original B 2007
46 7BCM champ N2843E Rebuilding stage
Cajun Connection way down south, most of you are yankees to me!
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21003
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Fuel vent relocation to wing

Post by GAHorn »

No matter. You're still illegal. :lol:
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
170C
Posts: 3182
Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 11:59 am

Re: Fuel vent relocation to wing

Post by 170C »

Ron/George, your mentioning of the fuel caps reminds me that for several years, up until late last year, I had purchased and used fuel caps that came from O'Riley's Auto Parts that were made to fit older Ford (and probably Chevy & others) pickup trucks that had the fuel spout sticking out of the cab. Former and deceased member Goody Goodrich put me on to them. They cost $6-$8, were polished aluminum or stainless (?), were/are vented and fit like a glove on our fuel tanks. Only problem is there isn't an easy way to connect the retaining chain. They certainly work as well as the rather expensive "official/approved" ones. And yes, George, I know, they are illegal :roll:
OLE POKEY
170C
Director:
2012-2018
User avatar
aaronhunley
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:10 pm

Re: Fuel vent relocation to wing

Post by aaronhunley »

I thought of an odd question while I was driving through the rain. I want to do some light IFR in my plane this summer. If I were to be flying through the rain, would any amount of rain, to be concerned about, enter my fuel system through the fuel vent or caps? I've never thought about it in any other plane because the fuel vent is located behind something.
Thanks
1948 170
N3815V
User avatar
Bruce Fenstermacher
Posts: 10318
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am

Re: Fuel vent relocation to wing

Post by Bruce Fenstermacher »

I personally wouldn't worry about it.

I think most water that leaks into the tanks leaks in from standing water around the mot around the fill caps not the caps or vent system.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!

Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21003
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Fuel vent relocation to wing

Post by GAHorn »

I have flown in rain that was continuous, and occasionally very heavy (could barely see the wingtips) and never experienced any problems.

<edit> And even if a few drops did enter the system the gascolator is intended to capture and hold it, to be drained next pre-flight.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
n2582d
Posts: 2821
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 4:58 am

Re: Fuel vent relocation to wing

Post by n2582d »

I contacted Steve and his son Brian of Steve's Aircraft about the fuel vent STC that he holds. This fuel vent gets rid of the overhead gooseneck vent. Instead of installing the vent line into the outboard end of the fuel tank like in later C-172s, Steve's vent does not modify the tanks at all. The vent T's into the overhead cross vent and then routes the vent over left fuel tank and out. The problem they are facing is with a required check valve. The one approved in the STC went from $40 to over $300. To use an alternate reasonably priced (read uncertified) valve they would have to come up with an approved test procedure to insure the break-out pressures are as advertised on each valve. Because of this issue this STC is on the back burner. But he said, "maybe your interest could get us looking for a valve again."
Gary
Post Reply